Greene Espel PLLP 222 South Ninth Street, Suite 2200, Minneapolis, MN 55402
Tel / 612.373.0830    Fax / 612.373.0929
Print Page
Business Litigation
Back to Practice Areas

Our business litigation practice embraces the wide variety of commercial disputes facing private and public companies today. Areas of particular expertise include intellectual property, antitrust, securities, employment, professional liability, and construction disputes. Our attorneys are experienced in handling matters involving complex financial instruments and transactions, trade secrets, and professional liability issues, and are regularly called upon to teach and write about these issues.

Trials

Most cases can and should be resolved short of trial. Some cannot. Our attorneys are experienced and respected trial lawyers with deep trial experience in state and federal courts. In fact, Greene Espel is often retained shortly before trial to assist or replace existing litigation counsel.

Complex Financial Instruments and Transactions
We regularly litigate disputes concerning complex financial instruments and investment vehicles such as hedge funds, low income tax credits, tax increment financing, venture capital, mortgage-backed securities, derivatives, Real Estate Investment Trusts, and trust indentures. We litigate these cases on behalf of financial institutions, securities professionals, investment firms, and individuals. We make these complex instruments and transactions accessible and understandable to judges and juries.

Class Actions and Multi-Party Cases
We have defended and prosecuted complex class actions involving allegations of securities fraud, breach of fiduciary duty in the corporate context, and other business torts.

Financial Experts
We work closely with financial experts and consultants to refute allegations of market manipulation in mortgage-backed securities, to trace millions of dollars in real estate transactions, to defend securities professionals on issues of due diligence, and to defend the practices of broker-dealers and investment advisors.

Pre-Litigation Investigations
Frequently, we are contacted by institutions interested in pursuing potential litigation concerning misconduct that they believe may have occurred. In these cases, we have successfully utilized a quick but thorough pre-litigation investigation to uncover the facts necessary both to bring the case and to resolve it quickly. Our experience has shown that a thorough pre-litigation investigation can save the client time and money where the results of the investigation provide the wrongdoer with little or no defense. For example:

 

  • The chairman of a Minnesota technology firm contacted us about the circumstances of a recent management buyout of an Ohio subsidiary. The subsidiary was purchased by its management after a broker hired by management was unable to present any credible offers to buy the company by an outside suitor. The Chairman believed that the broker and the subsidiary’s management had conspired to suppress credible offers. After a short investigation, including fact development in various states, we learned that an Arizona technology firm had offered to purchase the Ohio subsidiary for two and a half times the amount paid by management. We commenced litigation in federal court against the Ohio company, its management, and the broker for fraud and breach of fiduciary duties, and obtained summary judgment on our client’s behalf before discovery even began.

 

  • We were retained by a financial institution that had received information that a former employee had stolen a critical internal document detailing lending and compliance procedures. After a short investigation, we obtained witness statements and documentation demonstrating that the former employee had not only stolen the information, but had also provided it to the client’s chief competitor. We commenced litigation against the former employee and the competitor. The matter was settled immediately thereafter.


Responding to a Crisis
We are often contacted by clients facing legal and public relations crises. These matters require the immediate mobilization of attorneys, paralegals, and experts to assist the client through the emergency. Recent examples include:
 

  • When a “whistleblower” went public with allegations of widespread misconduct at the Minnesota facility of a national firm, we were retained to interview dozens of employees, review thousands of documents, and respond to regulators, law enforcement authorities, and the media. We mobilized a team of attorneys, paralegals, experts, and others to respond to the emergency, learn the facts, and resolve the matter.

 

  • During litigation on the East coast, a national securities firm was ordered to make dozens of Minnesota employees available for depositions immediately to address allegations of wrongdoing. We were retained to represent the employees, who faced serious allegations relating to a court-ordered settlement. Within days, we mobilized a team of attorneys and paralegals to master the litigation facts and the documents related to each employee. Within weeks, all employees were interviewed and prepared for their depositions.

 

  • A national health care firm learned through an article in a local newspaper of allegations of misconduct at its Minnesota facility. Within days, we assembled a team of attorneys and paralegals to conduct interviews of current and former employees in three states. We prepared a detailed report responding to the allegations. The report convinced regulators and potential private litigants not to pursue the allegations.


For more information, contact::

Larry Shapiro at 612.373.8325 or LShapiro@GreeneEspel.com 

Bob Gilbertson at 612.373.8333 or BGilbertson@GreeneEspel.com
Jeanette Bazis at 612.373.8358 or JBazis@GreeneEspel.com

Attorneys

John M Baker Jeanette M Bazis Sybil L Dunlop Larry D Espel Caitlinrose H Fisher Matthew D Forsgren Jenny Gassman-Pines Robert J Gilbertson Clifford M Greene Kathryn Nikolai Hibbard Mark L Johnson Aaron P Knoll Bethany D Krueger Peggy Kubicz Hall Monte A Mills Karl C Procaccini Faris Rashid Lawrence M Shapiro, P.A. Erin Sindberg Porter Katherine M Swenson Anna M Tobin John W Ursu David J Wallace-Jackson X. Kevin Zhao

News

Super Lawyers Recognizes Thirteen Greene Espel Lawyers in 2017 Sindberg Porter Named Up and Coming Lawyer by Minnesota Lawyer Federal Jury Awards Compensatory and Punitive Damages to Greene Espel Client Federal Court Upholds $11M Jury Award Against Toyota Greene Espel Receives Rankings in Chambers USA 2017 Greene and Tobin to speak at Minnesota CLE seminar Greene Espel Secures Tier 1 Rankings in "Best Law Firms" 2017 Seven Greene Espel Attorneys Listed in The Best Lawyers in America 2017 U.S. News – Best Lawyers 2016 ranks Greene Espel among top firms in Minneapolis Best Lawyers in America 2016 honors seven Greene Espel attorneys Greene Espel highlighted in Chambers USA 2015 Greene Espel client Vision-Sciences beats challenge to merger with Uroplasty Krueger speaks at Minnesota CLE ‘s Winning Tips for Successful Litigation seminar U.S. News – Best Lawyers 2015 ranks Greene Espel among top firms in Minneapolis Best Lawyers in America 2015 lists seven Greene Espel attorneys U.S. News – Best Lawyers 2014 ranks Greene Espel among top firms in Minneapolis Greene Espel client LivingSocial wins dismissal of consumer EFTA action Best Lawyers in America 2014 lists seven Greene Espel attorneys Super Lawyers 2013 recognizes eleven Greene Espel attorneys for honors U.S. News – Best Lawyers ranks Greene Espel among top firms in Minneapolis Best Lawyers in America 2013 lists six Greene Espel attorneys Greene, Luger, and Shapiro named to Best Lawyers 2012 list Chambers 2011: Greene Espel is a “highly regarded litigation boutique with outstanding litigators" Krueger presents at Minnesota CLE on antitrust issues in patent litigation Espel, Gassman-Pines present at Minnesota CLE Greene Espel client Tyson Foods wins Eighth Circuit appeal Chambers honors Greene Espel as a “superb firm with a first-class group of lawyers”