Greene Espel PLLP is delighted to announce that Sybil Dunlop was once again named to the Minnesota Lawyer “POWER 30” list for Business Litigation. To create the Power 30 list, Minnesota Lawyer interviewed respected Minnesota attorneys and leaders, reviewed outcomes of significant cases, and consulted the Minnesota Lawyer archives for “people whose achievements and influence we recognize as powerful business litigators in Minnesota.” When selecting the 30 attorneys, Minnesota Lawyer highlights those whose presence on a case “signifies the stakes, who have influenced the direction of the law, whose leadership in the community is pervasive and whose respect within the bar is undeniable.”
Sybil is a passionate and uncommonly persuasive advocate who helps clients resolve intellectual property and commercial disputes. Sybil's litigation practice affords her substantial first-chair trial and arbitration experience. Sources share that “she is brilliant, responsive and seeks to understand business objectives.” (Chambers USA, 2022). And Minnesota Lawyer has twice recognized her as “Attorney of the Year.” Bringing her skills to bear, Sybil successfully leads teams in litigations around the country.
Sybil’s experience includes representing Fortune 100 companies as they navigate disputes with contractors, clients, and business partners, including post-closing disputes involving net working capital or post-closing adjustments. She also helps clients evaluate, assess, and litigate intellectual property disputes from initial risk assessment through trial and appeal.
Sybil serves on the Infinity Project board, an organization dedicated to increasing the gender diversity of the state and federal bench. She co-founded Greene Espel’s DEI practice, which helps workplaces design and implement DEI strategies and programs to meet their goals. Sybil co-authored “Why the Legal Profession is the Nation’s Least Diverse (and How to Fix It),” which was published in the Mitchell Hamline Law Review, as well as its companion piece, “A Call for Action: How Clients and Judges Can Do More to Address the Legal Profession's Diversity Problem,” published in the University of St. Thomas Law Review.